jump to navigation

Barry Schwartz on our loss of wisdom | TED.com February 26, 2009

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Barry Schwartz

Barry Schwartz’s 2009 TED speech ties in with many of the discussions we have been having here at the GCCDS about values, ethics, service, and leadership.

- – -

About this talk

Barry Schwartz makes a passionate call for “practical wisdom” as an antidote to a society gone mad with bureaucracy. He argues powerfully that rules often fail us, incentives often backfire, and practical, everyday wisdom will help rebuild our world.

About Barry Schwartz

Barry Schwartz studies the link between economics and psychology, offering startling insights into modern life. Lately, working with Ken Sharpe, he’s studying wisdom.

Watch the video on TED.com.

Seminar #4: Design, ethics, and the naturalistic fallacy February 5, 2009

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Read more posts about architecture in Archispeak. [See the archive].

A wonderful thing about the Spring studio we have here is a weekly seminar in which the students (a mixed group from MSU, UT, and BAC) and many of the GCCDS staff talk about architecture. This year, we’re also carrying into the seminar some ideas from our conversations about values. The discussion is built around readings from this book:

Tools for Survival" by Thomas Fisher

Thomas Fisher is dean of the College of Design at the University of Minnesota, and in this book, he asks us to imagine a future in which the assumptions that our stable society depends upon — that every new building, for instance, will be connected to a reliable infrastructure providing electrical, water, and sewer — are no longer guaranteed (A possibility put forward in works like Jared Diamond’s Collapse).

Read on for a look at Fisher’s arguments and our discussion:

(more…)

‘Biloxi Treehouse Project’ published in Cityscape December 28, 2008

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak, Design/Build, Non-profits, Residential Design.
Tags:
1 comment so far

archispeak

Guess what! I recently had an article published. It’s in a HUD journal called Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research.

About Cityscape: The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Cityscape Volume 10, Number 3 is entitled, “Design and Disaster: Higher Education Responds to Hurricane Katrina.” My article is entitled:

‘Biloxi Treehouse Project’

You can read the the full article online. It’s essentially an overview of the design/build process on Patty’s house, a project I’ve been working on since I got here. Bryan Bell, who helped run the initial design/build studio, suggested I submit an article to Cityscape.

Abstract: When a group of students and designers took on the task of rebuilding Patricia Broussard’s East Biloxi home, they knew that building an elevated home to a high standard of quality and sustainability on a very limited budget would require a new approach. The project, known as “the treehouse,” became a laboratory for collaboration among students, designers, construction professionals, and volunteers seeking new solutions to these problems. The techniques explored and lessons learned will contribute to a higher standard for rebuilding along the Gulf Coast. [Full article]

There are several other interesting articles in this issue:

  • “Working With Experience” by David Perkes and Christine Gaspar. This article addresses the work of Mississippi State University’s Gulf Coast Community Design Studio to help families in Biloxi, Mississippi, after Hurricane Katrina damaged homes in the city. A very good summary of the history and values of the GCCDS, where I work!
  • “A Sustainable Housing Response to Hurricane Katrina” by John Quale and Kristina L. Iverson. This article describes the collaborative experience of the ecoMOD project at the University of Virginia (UVA) and Habitat for Humanity® International as they developed a prototypical ecological, prefabricated, and affordable home for a family along the Gulf Coast of Mississippi.
  • “Principles of Engagement: (mis)Understanding the Community-Design Studio” by Kathleen A. Dorgan. This article provides an overview of the benefits and challenges to universities and communities of design schools undertaking university-based community-design projects and suggests an ethical and practical framework for the planning, management, and evaluation of these studios.

Values, pt. 1: Positioning our Work December 17, 2008

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak, Non-profits.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

architspeak

‘Values, pt. 1: Positioning our Work’

The ‘Values Meal’ studio dinner on November 12 began a series of conversations about our individual values as designers and citizens and our collective values as the Gulf Coast Community Design Studio.

A community design studio must discover the best way to position its work. As part of our ongoing discussion, I drafted a diagram examining the position of the design studio in relation to other elements of society. (While I do believe that the design studio unites many of these elements, the diagram unintentionally makes it look like the center of civilization, which is probably an exaggeration).

valuesgraph

(more…)

Doug Nelson: ‘No small plans’ December 1, 2008

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak, Non-profits.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

architspeak

Thanks to Seth for referring me to Douglas Nelson’s speech at the Enterprise Community Partners Conference in Baltimore on November 20. Speaking to an audience of community development professionals, Nelson outlines the “under-acknowledged, under-analyzed, and misunderstood” impact of economic globalization on American communities. He identifies a coming turning point in America, and urges the community development movement to reposition itself “as part of a broader effort to restore economic security and insure a measure of family stability to the nation’s underemployed poor and working poor.” The full text of the speech, which isn’t long, is available on Enterprise’s website.

nelson

Douglas W. Nelson is President and CEO of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. He is one of the nation’s leading advocates for children and one of the country’s foremost experts on policies and community-based responses to improve the lives of at-risk children and their families. In addition to frequent lectures and addresses, Nelson has written widely on a range of domestic social policy issues. His social history of the World War II relocation of Japanese Americans entitled Heart Mountain earned him a Pulitzer Prize nomination in 1976. His other published works include studies and essays on children and youth, aging, long-term care, and housing. (Source)

‘No small plans’

I didn’t attend the conference, so I will largely let the text speak for itself. It touches on subjects that many Americans, including myself, have been pondering over the past couple months. ‘No small plans’ isn’t the title of Mr. Nelson’s speech (I don’t know if it had one), but it sums up its message: this is a pivotal time for our country, one that calls for bold new ideas. (This feeling has been going around; see the November 24 cover of TIME Magazine.)

Neither Barack Obama nor anybody else has fully articulated how the United States will refocus investment on infrastructure, the environment, and education. Mr. Nelson jokes, “If you wanted a really good answer to that question, you should have found somebody a lot smarter than I am for this slot in your conference.” But he delivers a good argument for placing some priorities first: creating “a national infrastructure and environmental initiative,” expanding “national investment in wage and work supports for America’s low-income working families,” and investing “in the early development, school readiness, academic success, and post-secondary educational opportunities for the children born to those struggling families.”

Have a read, and let me know what you think.

Maurice Cox: ‘Design for All’ November 18, 2008

Posted by Vincent in Archispeak, Architecture, Community Planning.
add a comment

architspeak

Coming rather late, here are my notes and thoughts from Maurice Cox’s October 13th lecture at the Tulane University School of Architecture. Maurice was my architecture studio professor in the spring of 4th year, and I’ve run into him since through his involvement with the City of Moss Point, Mississippi. He’s a brilliant guy, so there was no hesitation about heading over to New Orleans for the lecture. First, a little biographical information:

maurice

Maurice Cox was appointed Director of Design for the National Endowment for the Arts in October 2007 where he supervises the grant making process in design, oversees the Mayors’ Institute on City Design, Governors’ Institute on Community Design, and Your Town programs, and provides professional leadership in architecture and design to the nation. On leave from the University of Virginia School of Architecture in Charlottesville, where he is an Associate Professor of Architecture, Cox most recently led graduate students in the development of award-winning proposals for the rebuilding of affordable housing in New Orleans following the destruction of Hurricane Katrina. Cox served as Mayor of Charlottesville from 2002-2004. His experience merges architecture, politics and design education to define a new role for the designer—the architect as civic leader. He was a founding partner of RBGC Architecture, Research and Urbanism from 1996-2006. RBGC received national acclaim for its partnerships with communities traditionally underserved by architecture. Cox most recently partnered with Ken Schwartz in Community Planning + Design Workshop (CP+D). A recipient of the 2004-05 Loeb Fellow at the Harvard University Graduate School of Design and the 2006 John Hejduk Award for Architecture, Cox received his architectural education from the Cooper Union School of Architecture. (Source)

‘Design for All’

My much-abbreviated notes follow. The basic argument: Design is a basic democratic right that should be accessible to all.

The role of the designer is multifaceted — that of facilitator, problem solver, advocate, activist, instigator, public citizen. Design and public life must be intermingled, not separated by artificial distinctions of ‘professional’. Thomas Jefferson put it this way: “Design activity and political thought are indivisible.”

A designer in the public arena has an opportunity to engage the public and bring together everyone with a stake. This creates a discussion that can touch on the benefits, not just the dangers, of change.

A Community Design Center creates a neutral ground where people can enter into the design process much more comfortably than they could by, for instance, walking into a city planning department.

In the case of Charlottesville, VA, Maurice joined the City Council and then became mayor. During this time, changes took many years of constant effort. The very successful Downtown Mall, for instance, took 25 years to reach its current success. By contrast, many other cities have abandoned similar malls as failures after only a couple years.

Architects and designers should get involved in public life, but it doesn’t have to be as mayor: design anchored planning commissions, ad-hoc design task forces, and design review boards all play a role in the development of well-designed public space.

- – -

Again, my notes are pretty thin; I was familiar with many of the projects Maurice talked about, especially the City of Charlottesville, where I lived during college. His career is an interesting one because it’s the path very much less taken for architects, few of whom immerse themselves so much in public policy and civic leadership, and it’ll be worth following over the coming years.